By Knud Haakonssen
Greater than thirty eminent students from 9 various international locations have contributed to The Cambridge background of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy - the main finished and up to date heritage of the topic to be had in English. For the eighteenth century the dominant idea in philosophy used to be human nature and so it really is round this idea that the paintings is situated. this permits the members to supply either special explorations of the epistemological, metaphysical and moral subject matters that proceed to face on the vanguard of philosophy, and to voice a serious angle to the historiography in the back of this emphasis in philosophical proposal. while there's due sensitivity to ancient context with specific emphasis at the connections among philosophy, technology, and theology. This judiciously balanced, systematic, and entire account of the entire of Western philosophy within the interval can be a useful source for philosophers, highbrow historians, theologians, political theorists, historians of technological know-how and literary students.
Read or Download Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy PDF
Similar history & surveys books
Greater than thirty eminent students from 9 various nations have contributed to The Cambridge heritage of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy - the main accomplished and up to date background of the topic to be had in English. For the eighteenth century the dominant suggestion in philosophy used to be human nature and so it's round this idea that the paintings is founded.
To head throughout the pages of the Autobiography of Mario Bunge is to accompany him via dozens of nations and view the highbrow, political, philosophical and medical spheres of the final hundred years. it truly is an adventure that oscillates among diversified worlds: the various and the same, the pro and the non-public.
During this pioneering e-book, famous foreign students discover the bounds and definitions of understanding, pondering, and speaking which means as we circulation into the twenty first century. Coming from disciplines as different as anthropology, philosophy, literature, aesthetics, and artwork perform, jointly they paintings in the direction of reconceiving the bounds among entrenched domain names of data to nice impression.
- Wittgenstein: Opening Investigations
- Deleuze and Religion
- Modern/postmodern : off the beaten path of antimodernism
- The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy: Volume 2
- Starting with Hobbes
- Kierkegaard's Analysis of Radical Evil (Continuum Studies in Philosophy)
Additional info for Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy
3. 33 Kant, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, in Ak 5: 1–163; translated as Critique of Practical Reason, in Works/Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. M. J. Gregor (1996). 34 Kant, Kritik der Urtheilskraft, in Ak 5, Pt. 2: Kritik der teleologischen Urtheilskraft, ‘Allgemeine Anmerkung zur Teleologie’, 5: 475–85 at 481; translated as Critique of the Power of Judgment in Works/Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. P. Guyer and E. Matthews, ed. P. Guyer (2000). , Ak 6: 12; translated as Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, trans.
M. J. Gregor (1996). 34 Kant, Kritik der Urtheilskraft, in Ak 5, Pt. 2: Kritik der teleologischen Urtheilskraft, ‘Allgemeine Anmerkung zur Teleologie’, 5: 475–85 at 481; translated as Critique of the Power of Judgment in Works/Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. P. Guyer and E. Matthews, ed. P. Guyer (2000). , Ak 6: 12; translated as Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, trans. and eds. A. Wood and G. di Giovanni, in Works/Religion and Rational Theology. 36 Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Briefwechsel zwischen Goethe und F.
But atheism in the strict sense – denial of the existence of a god or gods – was not characteristic of the time. Many more, unpersuaded by the endless marshalling of arguments, chose the path either to scepticism or to fideism. What they had in common was that they took more seriously than Butler himself his remark that probable evidence is ‘relative only to beings of limited capacities’. For them, the question was about the limits of reason. Best known and most read of the eighteenth-century philosophers in Britain is today, of course, David Hume.