By Gilbert Harman, Ernest Lepore
This spouse brings jointly a group of top figures in modern philosophy to supply an in-depth exposition and research of Quine’s large effect throughout philosophy’s many subfields, highlighting the breadth of his paintings, and revealing his persevered value today.
- Provides an in-depth account and research of W.V.O. Quine’s contribution to American Philosophy, and his place as one of many past due twentieth-century’s so much influential analytic philosophers
- Brings jointly newly-commissioned essays by way of top figures inside of modern philosophy
- Covers Quine’s paintings throughout philosophy of common sense, philosophy of language, ontology and metaphysics, epistemology, and more
- Explores his paintings relating to the origins of analytic philosophy in the United States, and to the heritage of philosophy extra broadly
- Highlights the breadth of Quine’s paintings around the self-discipline, and demonstrates the ongoing effect of his paintings in the philosophical community
Read or Download A Companion to W. V. O. Quine PDF
Best history & surveys books
Greater than thirty eminent students from 9 varied international locations have contributed to The Cambridge heritage of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy - the main accomplished and up to date historical past of the topic on hand in English. For the eighteenth century the dominant inspiration in philosophy was once human nature and so it truly is round this idea that the paintings is based.
To move in the course of the pages of the Autobiography of Mario Bunge is to accompany him via dozens of nations and consider the highbrow, political, philosophical and clinical spheres of the final hundred years. it's an event that oscillates among varied worlds: the various and the same, the pro and the private.
During this pioneering booklet, famous overseas students discover the bounds and definitions of understanding, pondering, and speaking which means as we flow into the twenty first century. Coming from disciplines as diversified as anthropology, philosophy, literature, aesthetics, and paintings perform, jointly they paintings in the direction of reconceiving the bounds among entrenched domain names of data to nice impact.
- Idealism and Existentialism: Hegel and Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century European Philosophy
- Meister Eckhart in Erfurt (Miscellanea Mediaevalia)
- Between Universalism and Skepticism: Ethics as Social Artifact
Additional resources for A Companion to W. V. O. Quine
Edited by Gilbert Harman and Ernie Lepore. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. quine and the a priori Ayer explicitly rejected John Stuart Mill’s view that mathematical stateÂ�Â� ments have empirical content, that they are empirical generalizations. Ayer writes: In rejecting Mill’s theory, we are obliged to be somewhat dogmatic. 5 How is this to be understood? It appears that Ayer believes that we can know a priori that Mill is wrong; that this can be “seen” without any observation of empirical facts.
The Logical Syntax of Language. London: K. , Ltd. Carnap, Rudolf (1950). Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Carnap, Rudolf (1963). Intellectual Autobiography. A. ). The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (1–84). LaSalle, IL: Open Court. Foley, Richard (1987). The Theory of Epistemic Rationality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Frege, Gottlob (1884 ). The Foundations of Arithmetic. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. Giere, Ronald N. (1989).
Again, the difference is one of degree and not kind. In this way, Quine attempts to account for the seeming immunity from empirical disconfirmation of mathematics in a way that preserves the thoroughgoing empiricist idea that there is no deep difference between such truths and truths that are uncontroversially empirical. Whether his account is 20 quine and epistemology ultimately tenable, it is fair to say, I think, that it is the best answer to the challenge that empiricists have yet devised. â•‡ Overcoming Traditional Distinctions Quine’s celebrated attack on analyticity in “Two Dogmas of Empiricism” (1951) is in effect an attack on the notion of a priority.